Is there a proper
and an improper way to live?
Yes, I propose, and I'll go so far as to say that there is one overarching wrong way to live and one overarching right way
to live. Before I tell you what they are let’s hear what some average humans have to say about the subject:
Eleanor Roosevelt: “The purpose of life is to live it… to
reach out eagerly and without fear for newer and richer experience.”
George Bernard Shaw: “Life isn’t about finding yourself, it’s
about creating yourself.”
William Shakespeare: “This life… is a tale told by an idiot,
full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.”
Oscar Wilde: “Every saint has a past, every sinner has a
future.”
Albert Einstein: “There are two ways to live your life: One is as though nothing is a miracle, and the other as though everything is a
miracle.”
Johann Wolfgang
Goethe: “As soon as you
trust yourself you will know how to live.”
Helen Keller: “Everything has its
wonders, even darkness and silence, and I learn, whatever state I may be in,
therein to be content.”
Lao Tzu: “Don't resist… let things flow naturally
forward in whatever way they like.”
Socrates: “Beware the barrenness of a busy life.”
The way I see it none of the above can make
any sense unless you live your life in total surrender to the need to live in
the known. Those who convince themselves that around every corner they are in complete knowledge of what lies in front of them, and that they have
it all under control, are precisely the ones who never do.
Those who admit uncertainty—and in their uncertainty fervently and relentlessly seek
certainty—are the ones who are living properly.
As Alan Watts puts
it: “In giving away the control, you’ve got it.”
2 comments:
Anne Lamott dropped some knowledge on this subject, too:
"The opposite of faith is not doubt, it's certainty."
Love it, Lucy, thank you:)
Post a Comment